Home Today The Angolan Civil Battle: Battle Economics or the Divine Proper of Kings?

The Angolan Civil Battle: Battle Economics or the Divine Proper of Kings?


In 1975, after a hurried exit by the Portuguese, Angola gained liberation and have become considered one of a lot of African nations to erupt into battle within the wake of colonial independence. Like a lot of its continental friends, Angola lacked a unified independence motion. Because of this the three fundamental independence events, together with a lot of regional and worldwide companions, started the battle for Luanda and management of Angola. The battle raged by means of a lot of totally different political levels every altering the face of battle, together with the Chilly Battle, the top of Apartheid and two failed peace makes an attempt, solely discovering a bitter conclusion in 2002 with the loss of life of UNITA chief Jonas Savimbi.

When wanting on the causes of battle perpetuation it will be significant to not essentialise, civil wars are complicated and may hardly ever, if ever, be diminished to a single perpetuating issue. Throughout the African continent it’s simple to concentrate on the thought of ‘battle diamonds’, popularised by movies comparable to Blood Diamonds, because the driving pressure behind battle. This stays a charming narrative, simplifying a battle to look good as a headline. Nevertheless, this understanding trivialises and barbarises a battle, distilling battle all the way down to nothing greater than an train in economics by means of violent means. All conflicts are topic to a component of greed, battle offers a possibility and a canopy for people to make huge sums of cash and the Angolan Civil Battle was no totally different. The greed/grievance argument is a well-worn path in worldwide relations, nevertheless, to cut back a battle to those phrases does it a disservice.

Additionally it is necessary to know that conflicts as complicated because the Angolan Civil Battle have many various phases. This battle has at varied instances been seen as a postcolonial independence battle, an ideological battle, a Chilly Battle proxy and a useful resource battle. It subsequently turns into inconceivable to state the common significance of pure assets or any perpetuating think about sustaining violence throughout the historical past of the battle. Nevertheless, some generalisations will be made to additional an understanding of why this battle persevered for over 1 / 4 of a century. Right here we are going to search to know the varied significance of three elements in perpetuating the battle, starting first with the significance of pure assets within the battle. I’ll search to know how the financial advantages of those assets functioned in a different way for the MPLA, who maintained a grip on energy, and UNITA, the perennial opposition, in addition to how entry to totally different assets altered every sides expression of violence. This essay will then look to different elements in battle perpetuation and the way they’re linked to pure assets. Firstly, the Chilly Battle supplied the worldwide backdrop to lots of the political occasions of the late twentieth century, the Angolan Civil Battle didn’t escape this, turning into partly a proxy battle as each UNITA and the MPLA obtained huge quantities of monetary and army help from the US and the Soviet Bloc respectively. Lastly, we are going to examine the significance of Jonas Savimbi himself. It’s usually argued that his single-minded conviction in his divine proper to rule Angola was a big driving pressure in sustaining the battle and was a significant factor within the breakdown of the peace accords in 1992 and 1994.

Pure Sources and Their Expressions

Angola’s useful resource endowment stands out amongst even essentially the most useful resource wealthy nations. Whereas the main focus is understandably on oil and diamonds, as will probably be right here, Angola additionally has huge quantities of timber, treasured metals and minerals (Malaquias 2001). This abundance of riches funded a lot of the civil battle on either side. Simplistically, Angola’s useful resource reserves will be geographically divided. A lot of the oil is discovered offshore, benefiting the MPLA, who managed Luanda and the coastal area, whereas diamond reserves are positioned largely within the hinterlands managed on the time by UNITA (Malaquias 2001). This useful resource wealth to some extent dictated the actions and expression of those two, defining their methodology of conducting battle. For UNITA the diamond wealth afforded them the chance to maintain a insurrection in opposition to MPLA, usually choosing guerilla warfare. Whereas the coastal oil reserves allowed the MPLA to rule by means of a system of patrimonialism, constructed within the ruins of the colonial governance constructions (Stuvoy 2002). Within the shadow of the colonial battle and the rampant deprivation skilled by a good portion of the inhabitants there have been definitely grievances sufficient to clarify the appearance of insurrection. Nevertheless, the character of the colonial battle and the complicated political scenario encourages us to look past greed/grievance explanations for battle perpetuation.

It’s tough to estimate simply how rich UNITA grew to become by means of the sale of diamonds, as a result of clandestine nature of the market. Nevertheless, Angola is estimated to have the most important diamond wealth in Africa and is accountable for 5-8% of the worlds diamond provide at anyone time (Premoll 1992). The overwhelming majority of those diamond reserves got here to be beneath UNITA management – between 1981-86 the governments diamond income dropped from $221 million to $33 million (McCormick 1994). This diminished the federal government’s capability to achieve a army foothold within the hinterlands. Between 1992-2000 UNITA produced diamonds estimated to be valued between $3-4 billion (Le Billon 2001), which grew to become important as allies in Zaire and South Africa fell away by means of their very own political upheaval.

UNITA was a relative latecomer compared to the MPLA and FNLA and consequently couldn’t engender a lot assist from the Chilly Battle powers through the preliminary phases of the independence battle. The useful resource wealth gained by UNITA as they took management of the hinterlands allowed them to successfully ‘purchase in’ to the battle and maintain a battle effort, notably early on (Leao 2007). With the assets they’d at their disposal UNITA had been afforded the chance to take part within the civil battle, a possibility Savimbi grasped with each palms (Collier & Hoeffler 2001). They had been in a position to buy arms and key army gear important for guerilla warfare, whereas amassing a insurgent pressure estimated to be over 60,000 at one time (BBC Information 1999). The funds from diamond gross sales additionally purchased political energy as UNITA established an autonomous area 1979 and carried out a quasi-state with schooling and medical providers (Conciliation Sources 2004). Pure assets represented the mechanism by means of which the perpetuation of battle was realised, they conferred UNITA power and political legitimacy. This allowed UNITA to maintain a civil battle from a steady political base. It’s honest to say that with out diamonds UNITA wouldn’t have been in a position to maintain battle of any sort for such an prolonged time frame. That’s not to say they had been the one cause this occurred.

For the MPLA pure assets performed a distinct function. Initially of independence the MPLA managed Luanda and had been in a position to kind a authorities (Leao 2007). Coastal assets, beforehand managed by the Portuguese, allowed the MPLA to implement and preserve a system of patrimonial governance. This blended the financial with the political and the political with the non-public, distorting the mode of wealth creation (Médard 1982). Authority in Luanda was primarily based on a system of reciprocity during which every stage of presidency was in a position to personally profit from the oil wealth, thus securing loyalty. This ensured a sure ‘social order’ by creating stability primarily based on useful reciprocity (Stuvoy 2002). This allowed the MPLA the power to oppose UNITA and any overseas intervention, whereas sustaining a grip on Luanda and the levers of financial, and subsequently, political energy.

Coastal communities benefitted enormously from this oil wealth with these enclaves turning into wealthy and developed, offering the MPLA a steady area from which to manipulate. Nevertheless, this wealth, and by extension governing, didn’t lengthen throughout the entire nation, as wealth creation and governing had been inextricably linked. With out the management of the assets inland the MPLA couldn’t acquire a foothold because the patrimonial system of governance broke down. Because the battle continued, oil more and more grew to become used to fund the army and the existence of these in energy, whereas public providers and tasks fell by the wayside (Le Billon 2001). This strengthened the division between coastal elites and inland communities that appeared throughout colonialism and deepened the mistrust of the MPLA within the hinterland (Le Billon 2001). Oil income helped maintain battle in Angola by stabilising and funding a authorities, however solely in small enclaves. The dearth of wealth distribution impeded the MPLA’s makes an attempt to manage the entire nation and allowed UNITA the house to conduct their very own battle. Whereas the steadiness of pure assets between the MPLA and UNITA was uneven, it allowed either side to maintain a battle, whereas the geography and administration of assets additionally hindered the federal government’s skill to achieve an amazing victory. Nevertheless, this understanding of assets essentialises a battle as beholden to financial elements. This simplistic clarification of the Angolan battle doesn’t present a broad and nuanced understanding and errs in the direction of a condescending clarification of violence in a poor, postcolonial nation.

The Chilly Battle Context

Strategically and economically Angola has all the time engendered regional and worldwide curiosity. International assist started earlier than independence because the battle to manage Luanda by the November independence date intensified. This part will concentrate on overseas assist for UNITA, nevertheless, you will need to observe that the MPLA obtained big quantities of help from the Soviet Bloc (Shubin & Tokarev 2001). With out the monetary and army assist from the USSR and the army intervention of Cuba, it’s much less doubtless the MPLA would have been in a position to management Luanda and kind a authorities (Dunér 1981).

The US has an extended standing and sophisticated involvement in Angola, their preliminary assist within the post-independence nation got here alongside South Africa and Zaire for the FLNA, and in a lesser capability, UNITA, in an try and cease the MPLA gaining management of Angola (Leao 2007). The final word failure of this operation and the involvement of the Cubans and Soviets undoubtedly performed a task in future involvement by the US and its regional companions. The US was unwilling to just accept a negotiated settlement to this battle and strongly inspired Savimbi to militarily oppose the MPLA, in an try and disrupt and impede the Soviets (Bender 1981). This early involvement by the US framed the battle for Luanda as a army drawback with a army answer, discounting diplomacy and the potential for a unity authorities, involving all the main political events.

More and more by means of the Reagan administration, the precise wing, anti-Cuban foyer grew to become progressively extra vocal of their assist of Savimbi. With the Clark Modification being repealed in 1985, Reagan might overtly assist UNITA (Minter 1991). Intensive involvement from the US by means of the Eighties inspired South Africa to assist rebuild UNITA’s army capability, permitting them to proceed waging an more and more damaging battle (Minter 1991). Financial in addition to army assist from the US was backed up by technical and tactical assist from the Apartheid authorities in South Africa. The assist of those international and regional powerhouses emboldened UNITA on the world stage and supplied this newly shaped organisation the platform to wage battle. This help wasn’t economically motivated, in reality the robust anti-Cuban foyer suggests this was a deeply ideological assist primarily based not in the most effective pursuits of Angola however within the embarrassment and problem brought on to the US by having Cuba on its doorstep and the more and more radical anti-communist rabble in Washington. This allowed UNITA to maintain a battle effort in any other case far past their means.

The US involvement in Angola was nuanced and sophisticated, altering over the course of their involvement. Nevertheless, we are able to see, after the primary tried intervention to halt the communist MPLA that they didn’t pull out fully, nor did they search to interact solely with the MPLA to extract oil, as would have been the economically prudent factor to do. The US continued to assist UNITA and encourage the South Africans to do the identical. Their assist each financially and politically undoubtedly sustained the battle, as with out it Savimbi wouldn’t have been in a position to proceed for so long as he did. This assist was clearly not merely motivated by pure assets. If this had been so, the US would have sided with the MPLA. The conservative proper buoyed by an anti Cuban and anti communist agenda supported UNITA for ideological and energy causes. For the US, this was a possibility to oppose and disrupt the communist affect in Africa at a time of heightened tensions between the world’s two superpowers, a peaceable transition of energy in a liberated Angola was not as necessary. Whereas assets performed a task within the second scramble for Africa and will surely have motivated coverage makers on either side, the involvement of Chilly Battle powers was as a lot about energy, safety and beliefs because it was assets. So whereas pure assets had been undoubtedly necessary in sustaining battle and gaining worldwide engagement, so too was ideology and the political requirements of the Chilly Battle.

Jonas Savimbi’s Battle

One can’t clarify why the Angola Civil Battle endured because it did with out in search of to know the significance of Jonas Savimbi. Few insurgent leaders to emerge from the colonial battle throughout Africa had such unwavering pressure of persona, perseverance and resolute self-belief. His personal messianic sense of divine destiny powered UNITA by means of over 25 years of battle and two separate peace agreements. Savimbi was a fancy determine supported by the US and South Africa, ostensibly a nationalist however a pal of Che Guevara and a pupil of Mao (Bridgland 1986). He was a person strolling a tightrope between ideologies and political powers, consumed by private ambition. He emerged by means of the ranks of the FLNA, having been a one time member of the MPLA Youth wing, however disillusionment with the techniques and ambition of his FLNA friends noticed him launch UNITA to realize his political objectives and propel him into the main function (Brittain 2002). Whereas different stakeholders had been key too, Savimbi was undoubtedly the only most necessary actor all through the battle.

It was this persona and pervasive charisma that made him an extremely marketable and palatable potential chief for western audiences (Brittain 2002). He was a determine who might encapsulate the democratic spirit of the Chilly Battle West and oppose the creeping Soviet affect throughout the continent, appearing as ballast in opposition to western fears of communism. This picture was strictly cultivated in Washington by the well-connected PR agency Black, Manafort, Stone and Kelly, who lobbied on Savimbi’s behalf (Minter 1991). This bolstered his political and monetary leverage within the West, gaining him growing assist within the US Congress, which rapidly translated into extra than simply political energy. Western assist allowed him to keep up a grip over the Angolan hinterlands, and grew his capability to proceed the damaging civil battle with more and more superior army provides and technical assist.

Savimbi’s charisma and intelligence was matched by a willpower and self-belief, bordering on insanity, that the presidency was rightfully his. It was this self-discipline that pressured the resumption of battle after he failed to achieve the presidency by means of a quasi-legitimate 1992 election, mandated by the Bicesse settlement (Brittain 2002). This peace accord got here at an opportune time for Savimbi because the MPLA had been militarily weakened and he had been given assurances by overseas powers that the election was his (Fortna 2003). After the failure of 1992 it grew to become clear {that a} army victory can be the one path to energy and Savimbi took to this with a renewed ferocity (Messiant 2004). The battle waged after the Bicesse Accord was way more vicious than what had come earlier than. The loss of life toll and destruction brought on was immeasurably increased with a lot of the inhabitants ravenous as provide planes had been shot down and infrastructure razed to the bottom (Brittain 2002). This was all accomplished in an try to achieve the presidency, with no regard for the individuals he would doubtlessly be governing. This second part of the battle nearly felt like an try and punish the inhabitants for not confirming Savimbi as their chief. This single mindedness sustained battle by means of sheer pressure of will.

Savimbi’s persona performed an important function in sustaining the battle. With out his intelligence and allure he wouldn’t have develop into such a pivotal determine within the wider politics of the Chilly Battle and wouldn’t have obtained the help he wanted to perpetuate the battle throughout this era. It was additionally by means of his particular character and ferocious willpower that he pressured the resumption of battle when issues didn’t go his means. It’s tough to make any definitive predictions, however it’s honest to say with out Savimbi main the insurrection, the Angolan Civil Battle would most likely not have gone on for so long as it did and it’s telling how rapidly the battle was delivered to an finish following his loss of life in 2002. UNITA will surely not have been the ability that it was for 25 years. Nevertheless, you will need to level out that with out the monetary energy of the diamond mines UNITA managed, Savimbi would have been unable to rent such an costly PR agency, and his affect, notably through the Reagan administration, might not have been so nice. Nevertheless, this may additionally not have been potential with out the context of the Chilly Battle. He wouldn’t have had such a outstanding function within the West’s overseas coverage if he had not been seen as a bastion of democracy combating communism, which was, on the time, on the forefront of western political thought.


It’s clear there is no such thing as a panacea to clarify why the Angolan Civil Battle went on for therefore lengthy. It should be understood as a sequence of interconnected elements that ebbed and flowed because the nationwide and worldwide context modified. Nevertheless, what can be clear is that pure assets performed a really important function within the perpetuation of the Angolan Civil Battle, permitting each events to fund a damaging battle effort and purchase favour with the world’s main powers. By way of every ‘stage’ of the battle they remained extremely important. Considerable pure assets initially allowed UNITA to develop into a serious participant within the submit independence battle and even after the Chilly Battle engagement had waned, they allowed each events to perpetuate the battle. Diamonds supplied a constant funding stream for UNITA, permitting it to manage a lot of the Angolan inside, whereas coastal oil reserves meant the MPLA might preserve management over the centres of energy. The steadiness these assets supplied additionally ensured neither aspect might rating a definitive army victory. It’s nevertheless necessary to know how this suits in with different elements. Savimbi’s persona drove UNITA ahead by means of a lot of hardships and led to UNITA resuming the battle after the 1992 election loss. His charisma purchased him many buddies within the West and ensured political and monetary clout by means of a lot of the battle. His sense of divine proper undoubtedly perpetuated the battle and brought on untold destruction. Nevertheless, charisma and willpower can solely carry somebody thus far, and you will need to perceive the way it connects to different exterior elements. UNITA would have initially been too weak to contest a civil battle, which might most probably have led to the US and its companions dismissing them as a viable candidate. It’s even much less doubtless the worldwide group would have develop into as concerned had it not been for the strategic alternative Angola represented inside the political context of the Chilly Battle. Ideologically, at the least on the floor, worldwide help was supplied alongside Chilly Battle traces, making certain the battle escalated and was sustained arguably artificially. Whereas this supplied each the USSR and the US the chance to bloody the others nostril and disrupt their international unfold. This Chilly Battle context additionally supplied a platform for Savimbi’s persona to shine and develop into the keeper of western values in Southern Africa.

Pure assets stay such a big explanatory issue due to their constant significance all through each stage of the battle. With out Angola’s pure riches the battle wouldn’t have persevered because it did. They funded a lot of the hostilities but additionally made connections between, and supplied the platform for, different elements, which permit for a extra nuanced clarification of battle perpetuation.

There are in fact a lot of elements in battle perpetuation that might not be explored right here. As with most conflicts there was an ethnic dynamic at play in Angola, however to what extent this was necessary as compared, or together with ideological divisions, can be attention-grabbing to discover. Equally this essay solely explored the ideology of this battle by means of the worldwide, inside the context of the Chilly Battle. It should even be understood at an area and nationwide stage. How necessary was this divide to atypical Angolans? What function did ideology play in people taking on arms and persevering with to struggle by means of tough situations? Was poverty and a possibility to achieve a constant wage a extra necessary issue when contemplating enlisting charges? We now have additionally not explored the significance of colonial context. Answering these questions represents the subsequent stage in exploring the persistence of this and different conflicts.


BBC Information. (1999). UNITA is Completed Says Angolan Military. Accessed on 21/5/20 http://information.bbc.co.uk/1/hello/world/africa/570616.stm

Bender, G. (1981). Angola: Left, Proper & Mistaken. International Coverage, (43), 53-69.

Bridgland, F. (1986). Jonas Savimbi: a Key to Africa. Paragon Home.

Brittain, V. (2002). Jonas Savimbi, 1934–2002, 29:91, 128-130

Collier, P. & A. Hoeffler. (2001): Greed and grievance in civil battle, 21 Oct. 2005 (World Financial institution Working Paper 28126)

Conciliation Sources. (2004). ‘Profiles’. Conciliation Sources Accord Concern 15. 80-84.

Dunér, B. (1981). Proxy Intervention in Civil Wars. Journal of Peace Analysis, 18(4), 353–361.

Fortna, V. (2003). A Misplaced Probability for Peace: The Bicesse Accords in Angola. Georgetown Journal of Worldwide Affairs, 4(1), 73-79.

Leão, A. (2007). Completely different alternatives, totally different outcomes: civil battle and insurgent teams in Angola and Mozambique, Dialogue Paper, No. 24/2007.

Le Billon, P. (2001). Angola’s Political Financial system of Battle: The Function of Oil and Diamonds, 1975-2000. African Affairs, 100(398), 55-80.

Malaquias, A (2001) Making battle & a number of cash: the political economic system of protracted battle in Angola, Evaluation of African Political Financial system, 28:90, 521-536,

McCormick, S. (1994). The Angolan Financial system: Prospects For Progress In A Postwar Surroundings. Routledge.

Médard, J. (1982). The Underdeveloped State in Tropical Africa: Political Clientelism or Neopatrimonialism? In: Clapham, Christopher (ed.): Non-public Patronage and Public Energy. Political Clientelism within the Trendy State. London: Frances Pinter (pp.162-192)

Messiant, C. (2004). Why did Bicesse and Lusaka fail? A crucial evaluation. Conciliation Sources Accord Concern 15. 16-23.

Minter, W. (1991). The US and the Battle in Angola. Evaluation of African Political Financial system, (50), 135-144.

Premoll, C (1992), ‘Angola Emerges as Exploration Goal’, Engineering and Mining Journal, July p32.

Stuvoy, Okay. (2002). Battle Financial system and the Social Order of Insurgencies: An Evaluation of the Inside Construction of UNITA’s Battle Financial system. Universität Hamburg – IPW, analysis models of battle.

Shubin, V & Tokarev, A (2001) Battle in Angola: a Soviet dimension, Evaluation of African Political Financial system, 28:90, 607-618.

Written at: King’s Faculty London
Written for: Mats Berdal
Date Written: June 2020

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here